The story was presented partially as the new guy coming in from Mississippi being the right guy to fix things, juxtaposed with the current CEO and his off-target demeanor being on his way out and how he is expected to receive a hefty pension package.The story was being told from London, where BP is based.
The tone was mixed;
positive when talking about the new CEO and negative when talking about the
outgoing CEO, Hayward. Images of the aftermath of the spill were used as well
as images of Hayward out yachting instead of focusing on the spill and
cleanup. Positive images and clips of the incoming CEO put a very good spin
on things for BP to try to reassure stakeholders and the American public that
were dealing with the massive environmental disaster.
I believe the story worked well for BP in turning the tide of public opinion somewhat and to show that change was coming through the departure of the detached CEO seen as responsible for the mess in the Gulf.
I believe the story worked well for BP in turning the tide of public opinion somewhat and to show that change was coming through the departure of the detached CEO seen as responsible for the mess in the Gulf.
No comments:
Post a Comment